Post COVID-19: a solution scan of options for preventing future zoonotic epidemics
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Post COVID-19 : a solution scan of options for preventing future zoonotic epidemics. / Petrovan, Silviu O.; Aldridge, David C.; Bartlett, Harriet; Bladon, Andrew J.; Booth, Hollie; Broad, Steven; Broom, Donald M.; Burgess, Neil D.; Cleaveland, Sarah; Cunningham, Andrew A.; Ferri, Maurizio; Hinsley, Amy; Hua, Fangyuan; Hughes, Alice C.; Jones, Kate; Kelly, Moira; Mayes, George; Radakovic, Milorad; Ugwu, Chinedu A.; Uddin, Nasir; Veríssimo, Diogo; Walzer, Christian; White, Thomas B.; Wood, James L.; Sutherland, William J.
In: Biological Reviews, 2021, p. 2694-2715.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Post COVID-19
T2 - a solution scan of options for preventing future zoonotic epidemics
AU - Petrovan, Silviu O.
AU - Aldridge, David C.
AU - Bartlett, Harriet
AU - Bladon, Andrew J.
AU - Booth, Hollie
AU - Broad, Steven
AU - Broom, Donald M.
AU - Burgess, Neil D.
AU - Cleaveland, Sarah
AU - Cunningham, Andrew A.
AU - Ferri, Maurizio
AU - Hinsley, Amy
AU - Hua, Fangyuan
AU - Hughes, Alice C.
AU - Jones, Kate
AU - Kelly, Moira
AU - Mayes, George
AU - Radakovic, Milorad
AU - Ugwu, Chinedu A.
AU - Uddin, Nasir
AU - Veríssimo, Diogo
AU - Walzer, Christian
AU - White, Thomas B.
AU - Wood, James L.
AU - Sutherland, William J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The crisis generated by the emergence and pandemic spread of COVID-19 has thrown into the global spotlight the dangers associated with novel diseases, as well as the key role of animals, especially wild animals, as potential sources of pathogens to humans. There is a widespread demand for a new relationship with wild and domestic animals, including suggested bans on hunting, wildlife trade, wet markets or consumption of wild animals. However, such policies risk ignoring essential elements of the problem as well as alienating and increasing hardship for local communities across the world, and might be unachievable at scale. There is thus a need for a more complex package of policy and practical responses. We undertook a solution scan to identify and collate 161 possible options for reducing the risks of further epidemic disease transmission from animals to humans, including potential further SARS-CoV-2 transmission (original or variants). We include all categories of animals in our responses (i.e. wildlife, captive, unmanaged/feral and domestic livestock and pets) and focus on pathogens (especially viruses) that, once transmitted from animals to humans, could acquire epidemic potential through high rates of human-to-human transmission. This excludes measures to prevent well-known zoonotic diseases, such as rabies, that cannot readily transmit between humans. We focused solutions on societal measures, excluding the development of vaccines and other preventive therapeutic medicine and veterinary medicine options that are discussed elsewhere. We derived our solutions through reading the scientific literature, NGO position papers, and industry guidelines, collating our own experiences, and consulting experts in different fields. Herein, we review the major zoonotic transmission pathways and present an extensive list of options. The potential solutions are organised according to the key stages of the trade chain and encompass solutions that can be applied at the local, regional and international scales. This is a set of options targeted at practitioners and policy makers to encourage careful examination of possible courses of action, validating their impact and documenting outcomes.
AB - The crisis generated by the emergence and pandemic spread of COVID-19 has thrown into the global spotlight the dangers associated with novel diseases, as well as the key role of animals, especially wild animals, as potential sources of pathogens to humans. There is a widespread demand for a new relationship with wild and domestic animals, including suggested bans on hunting, wildlife trade, wet markets or consumption of wild animals. However, such policies risk ignoring essential elements of the problem as well as alienating and increasing hardship for local communities across the world, and might be unachievable at scale. There is thus a need for a more complex package of policy and practical responses. We undertook a solution scan to identify and collate 161 possible options for reducing the risks of further epidemic disease transmission from animals to humans, including potential further SARS-CoV-2 transmission (original or variants). We include all categories of animals in our responses (i.e. wildlife, captive, unmanaged/feral and domestic livestock and pets) and focus on pathogens (especially viruses) that, once transmitted from animals to humans, could acquire epidemic potential through high rates of human-to-human transmission. This excludes measures to prevent well-known zoonotic diseases, such as rabies, that cannot readily transmit between humans. We focused solutions on societal measures, excluding the development of vaccines and other preventive therapeutic medicine and veterinary medicine options that are discussed elsewhere. We derived our solutions through reading the scientific literature, NGO position papers, and industry guidelines, collating our own experiences, and consulting experts in different fields. Herein, we review the major zoonotic transmission pathways and present an extensive list of options. The potential solutions are organised according to the key stages of the trade chain and encompass solutions that can be applied at the local, regional and international scales. This is a set of options targeted at practitioners and policy makers to encourage careful examination of possible courses of action, validating their impact and documenting outcomes.
KW - coronavirus
KW - emerging infectious disease
KW - pandemic prevention
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - wildlife trade
KW - zoonotic risk
KW - zoonotic spillover
U2 - 10.1111/brv.12774
DO - 10.1111/brv.12774
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34231315
AN - SCOPUS:85109185273
SP - 2694
EP - 2715
JO - Biological Reviews
JF - Biological Reviews
SN - 1464-7931
ER -
ID: 276269284