Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies. / Bohmann, Kristine; Elbrecht, Vasco; Carøe, Christian; Bista, Iliana; Leese, Florian; Bunce, Michael; Yu, Douglas W.; Seymour, Mathew; Dumbrell, Alex J.; Creer, Simon.

In: Molecular Ecology Resources, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2022, p. 1231-1246.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Bohmann, K, Elbrecht, V, Carøe, C, Bista, I, Leese, F, Bunce, M, Yu, DW, Seymour, M, Dumbrell, AJ & Creer, S 2022, 'Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies', Molecular Ecology Resources, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1231-1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13512

APA

Bohmann, K., Elbrecht, V., Carøe, C., Bista, I., Leese, F., Bunce, M., Yu, D. W., Seymour, M., Dumbrell, A. J., & Creer, S. (2022). Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies. Molecular Ecology Resources, 22(4), 1231-1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13512

Vancouver

Bohmann K, Elbrecht V, Carøe C, Bista I, Leese F, Bunce M et al. Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2022;22(4):1231-1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13512

Author

Bohmann, Kristine ; Elbrecht, Vasco ; Carøe, Christian ; Bista, Iliana ; Leese, Florian ; Bunce, Michael ; Yu, Douglas W. ; Seymour, Mathew ; Dumbrell, Alex J. ; Creer, Simon. / Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies. In: Molecular Ecology Resources. 2022 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 1231-1246.

Bibtex

@article{53acee39e1a34fae96576338cbcbce0d,
title = "Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies",
abstract = "Metabarcoding of DNA extracted from environmental or bulk specimen samples is increasingly used to profile biota in basic and applied biodiversity research because of its targeted nature that allows sequencing of genetic markers from many samples in parallel. To achieve this, PCR amplification is carried out with primers designed to target a taxonomically informative marker within a taxonomic group, and sample-specific nucleotide identifiers are added to the amplicons prior to sequencing. The latter enables assignment of the sequences back to the samples they originated from. Nucleotide identifiers can be added during the metabarcoding PCR and during “library preparation”, that is, when amplicons are prepared for sequencing. Different strategies to achieve this labelling exist. All have advantages, challenges and limitations, some of which can lead to misleading results, and in the worst case compromise the fidelity of the metabarcoding data. Given the range of questions addressed using metabarcoding, ensuring that data generation is robust and fit for the chosen purpose is critically important for practitioners seeking to employ metabarcoding for biodiversity assessments. Here, we present an overview of the three main workflows for sample-specific labelling and library preparation in metabarcoding studies on Illumina sequencing platforms; one-step PCR, two-step PCR, and tagged PCR. Further, we distill the key considerations for researchers seeking to select an appropriate metabarcoding strategy for their specific study. Ultimately, by gaining insights into the consequences of different metabarcoding workflows, we hope to further consolidate the power of metabarcoding as a tool to assess biodiversity across a range of applications.",
keywords = "amplicon sequencing, biodiversity assessment, eDNA, environmental DNA, high-throughput sequencing, Illumina sequencing, library preparation",
author = "Kristine Bohmann and Vasco Elbrecht and Christian Car{\o}e and Iliana Bista and Florian Leese and Michael Bunce and Yu, {Douglas W.} and Mathew Seymour and Dumbrell, {Alex J.} and Simon Creer",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Resources published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/1755-0998.13512",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "1231--1246",
journal = "Molecular Ecology",
issn = "0962-1083",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies

AU - Bohmann, Kristine

AU - Elbrecht, Vasco

AU - Carøe, Christian

AU - Bista, Iliana

AU - Leese, Florian

AU - Bunce, Michael

AU - Yu, Douglas W.

AU - Seymour, Mathew

AU - Dumbrell, Alex J.

AU - Creer, Simon

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Resources published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Metabarcoding of DNA extracted from environmental or bulk specimen samples is increasingly used to profile biota in basic and applied biodiversity research because of its targeted nature that allows sequencing of genetic markers from many samples in parallel. To achieve this, PCR amplification is carried out with primers designed to target a taxonomically informative marker within a taxonomic group, and sample-specific nucleotide identifiers are added to the amplicons prior to sequencing. The latter enables assignment of the sequences back to the samples they originated from. Nucleotide identifiers can be added during the metabarcoding PCR and during “library preparation”, that is, when amplicons are prepared for sequencing. Different strategies to achieve this labelling exist. All have advantages, challenges and limitations, some of which can lead to misleading results, and in the worst case compromise the fidelity of the metabarcoding data. Given the range of questions addressed using metabarcoding, ensuring that data generation is robust and fit for the chosen purpose is critically important for practitioners seeking to employ metabarcoding for biodiversity assessments. Here, we present an overview of the three main workflows for sample-specific labelling and library preparation in metabarcoding studies on Illumina sequencing platforms; one-step PCR, two-step PCR, and tagged PCR. Further, we distill the key considerations for researchers seeking to select an appropriate metabarcoding strategy for their specific study. Ultimately, by gaining insights into the consequences of different metabarcoding workflows, we hope to further consolidate the power of metabarcoding as a tool to assess biodiversity across a range of applications.

AB - Metabarcoding of DNA extracted from environmental or bulk specimen samples is increasingly used to profile biota in basic and applied biodiversity research because of its targeted nature that allows sequencing of genetic markers from many samples in parallel. To achieve this, PCR amplification is carried out with primers designed to target a taxonomically informative marker within a taxonomic group, and sample-specific nucleotide identifiers are added to the amplicons prior to sequencing. The latter enables assignment of the sequences back to the samples they originated from. Nucleotide identifiers can be added during the metabarcoding PCR and during “library preparation”, that is, when amplicons are prepared for sequencing. Different strategies to achieve this labelling exist. All have advantages, challenges and limitations, some of which can lead to misleading results, and in the worst case compromise the fidelity of the metabarcoding data. Given the range of questions addressed using metabarcoding, ensuring that data generation is robust and fit for the chosen purpose is critically important for practitioners seeking to employ metabarcoding for biodiversity assessments. Here, we present an overview of the three main workflows for sample-specific labelling and library preparation in metabarcoding studies on Illumina sequencing platforms; one-step PCR, two-step PCR, and tagged PCR. Further, we distill the key considerations for researchers seeking to select an appropriate metabarcoding strategy for their specific study. Ultimately, by gaining insights into the consequences of different metabarcoding workflows, we hope to further consolidate the power of metabarcoding as a tool to assess biodiversity across a range of applications.

KW - amplicon sequencing

KW - biodiversity assessment

KW - eDNA

KW - environmental DNA

KW - high-throughput sequencing

KW - Illumina sequencing

KW - library preparation

U2 - 10.1111/1755-0998.13512

DO - 10.1111/1755-0998.13512

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34551203

AN - SCOPUS:85117133450

VL - 22

SP - 1231

EP - 1246

JO - Molecular Ecology

JF - Molecular Ecology

SN - 0962-1083

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 282939129