A theoretical analysis of taxonomic binning accuracy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

A theoretical analysis of taxonomic binning accuracy. / De Sanctis, Bianca; Money, Daniel; Pedersen, Mikkel Winther; Durbin, Richard.

In: Molecular Ecology Resources, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2022, p. 2208-2219.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

De Sanctis, B, Money, D, Pedersen, MW & Durbin, R 2022, 'A theoretical analysis of taxonomic binning accuracy', Molecular Ecology Resources, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2208-2219. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13608

APA

De Sanctis, B., Money, D., Pedersen, M. W., & Durbin, R. (2022). A theoretical analysis of taxonomic binning accuracy. Molecular Ecology Resources, 22(6), 2208-2219. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13608

Vancouver

De Sanctis B, Money D, Pedersen MW, Durbin R. A theoretical analysis of taxonomic binning accuracy. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2022;22(6):2208-2219. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13608

Author

De Sanctis, Bianca ; Money, Daniel ; Pedersen, Mikkel Winther ; Durbin, Richard. / A theoretical analysis of taxonomic binning accuracy. In: Molecular Ecology Resources. 2022 ; Vol. 22, No. 6. pp. 2208-2219.

Bibtex

@article{28303a4408d44562a9971375f52d4557,
title = "A theoretical analysis of taxonomic binning accuracy",
abstract = "Many metagenomic and environmental DNA studies require the taxonomic assignment of individual reads or sequences by aligning reads to a reference database, known as taxonomic binning. When a read aligns to more than one reference sequence, it is often classified based on sequence similarity. This step can assign reads to incorrect taxa, at a rate which depends both on the assignment algorithm and on underlying population genetic and database parameters. In particular, as we move towards using environmental DNA to study eukaryotic taxa subject to regular recombination, we must take into account issues concerning gene tree discordance. Though accuracy is often compared across algorithms using a fixed data set, the relative impact of these population genetic and database parameters on accuracy has not yet been quantified. Here, we develop both a theoretical and simulation framework in the simplified case of two reference species, and compute binning accuracy over a wide range of parameters, including sequence length, species–query divergence time, divergence times of the reference species, reference database completeness, sample age and effective population size. We consider two assignment methods and contextualize our results using parameters from a recent ancient environmental DNA study, comparing them to the commonly used discriminative k-mer-based method Clark (Current Biology, 31, 2021, 2728; BMC Genomics, 16, 2015, 1). Our results quantify the degradation in assignment accuracy as the samples diverge from their closest reference sequence, and with incompleteness of reference sequences. We also provide a framework in which others can compute expected accuracy for their particular method or parameter set. Code is available at https://github.com/bdesanctis/binning-accuracy.",
keywords = "coalescent theory, environmental DNA, metagenomics, taxonomic binning",
author = "{De Sanctis}, Bianca and Daniel Money and Pedersen, {Mikkel Winther} and Richard Durbin",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Resources published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/1755-0998.13608",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "2208--2219",
journal = "Molecular Ecology",
issn = "0962-1083",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A theoretical analysis of taxonomic binning accuracy

AU - De Sanctis, Bianca

AU - Money, Daniel

AU - Pedersen, Mikkel Winther

AU - Durbin, Richard

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Resources published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Many metagenomic and environmental DNA studies require the taxonomic assignment of individual reads or sequences by aligning reads to a reference database, known as taxonomic binning. When a read aligns to more than one reference sequence, it is often classified based on sequence similarity. This step can assign reads to incorrect taxa, at a rate which depends both on the assignment algorithm and on underlying population genetic and database parameters. In particular, as we move towards using environmental DNA to study eukaryotic taxa subject to regular recombination, we must take into account issues concerning gene tree discordance. Though accuracy is often compared across algorithms using a fixed data set, the relative impact of these population genetic and database parameters on accuracy has not yet been quantified. Here, we develop both a theoretical and simulation framework in the simplified case of two reference species, and compute binning accuracy over a wide range of parameters, including sequence length, species–query divergence time, divergence times of the reference species, reference database completeness, sample age and effective population size. We consider two assignment methods and contextualize our results using parameters from a recent ancient environmental DNA study, comparing them to the commonly used discriminative k-mer-based method Clark (Current Biology, 31, 2021, 2728; BMC Genomics, 16, 2015, 1). Our results quantify the degradation in assignment accuracy as the samples diverge from their closest reference sequence, and with incompleteness of reference sequences. We also provide a framework in which others can compute expected accuracy for their particular method or parameter set. Code is available at https://github.com/bdesanctis/binning-accuracy.

AB - Many metagenomic and environmental DNA studies require the taxonomic assignment of individual reads or sequences by aligning reads to a reference database, known as taxonomic binning. When a read aligns to more than one reference sequence, it is often classified based on sequence similarity. This step can assign reads to incorrect taxa, at a rate which depends both on the assignment algorithm and on underlying population genetic and database parameters. In particular, as we move towards using environmental DNA to study eukaryotic taxa subject to regular recombination, we must take into account issues concerning gene tree discordance. Though accuracy is often compared across algorithms using a fixed data set, the relative impact of these population genetic and database parameters on accuracy has not yet been quantified. Here, we develop both a theoretical and simulation framework in the simplified case of two reference species, and compute binning accuracy over a wide range of parameters, including sequence length, species–query divergence time, divergence times of the reference species, reference database completeness, sample age and effective population size. We consider two assignment methods and contextualize our results using parameters from a recent ancient environmental DNA study, comparing them to the commonly used discriminative k-mer-based method Clark (Current Biology, 31, 2021, 2728; BMC Genomics, 16, 2015, 1). Our results quantify the degradation in assignment accuracy as the samples diverge from their closest reference sequence, and with incompleteness of reference sequences. We also provide a framework in which others can compute expected accuracy for their particular method or parameter set. Code is available at https://github.com/bdesanctis/binning-accuracy.

KW - coalescent theory

KW - environmental DNA

KW - metagenomics

KW - taxonomic binning

U2 - 10.1111/1755-0998.13608

DO - 10.1111/1755-0998.13608

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35285150

AN - SCOPUS:85129482760

VL - 22

SP - 2208

EP - 2219

JO - Molecular Ecology

JF - Molecular Ecology

SN - 0962-1083

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 307297763