Annual air temperature variability and biotic interactions explain tundra shrub species abundance
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Annual air temperature variability and biotic interactions explain tundra shrub species abundance. / von Oppen, Jonathan; Normand, Signe; Bjorkman, Anne D.; Blach-Overgaard, Anne; Assmann, Jakob J.; Forchhammer, Mads; Guéguen, Maya; Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob.
In: Journal of Vegetation Science, Vol. 32, No. 2, e13009, 2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Annual air temperature variability and biotic interactions explain tundra shrub species abundance
AU - von Oppen, Jonathan
AU - Normand, Signe
AU - Bjorkman, Anne D.
AU - Blach-Overgaard, Anne
AU - Assmann, Jakob J.
AU - Forchhammer, Mads
AU - Guéguen, Maya
AU - Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 International Association for Vegetation Science
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Questions: Shrub vegetation has been expanding across much of the rapidly changing Arctic. Yet, there is still uncertainty about the underlying drivers of shrub community composition. Here, we use extensive vegetation surveys and a trait-based approach to answer the following questions: which abiotic and biotic factors explain abundance of shrub species and functional groups in the Arctic tundra, and can we interpret these relationships using plant traits related to resource acquisition?. Location: Nuup Kangerlua (Godthåbsfjord), western Greenland. Methods: We tested the power of nine climatic, topographic and biotic variables to explain the abundances of nine shrub species using a Bayesian hierarchical modelling framework. Results: We found highly variable responses among species and functional groups to both abiotic and biotic environmental variation. The overall most important abiotic explanatory variable was annual air temperature variability, which was highly correlated with winter minimum air temperature. Functional community composition and graminoid abundance were the most influential biotic factors. While we did not find systematic patterns between shrub abundances and abiotic variables with regard to resource acquisition traits, these traits did explain relationships between shrub abundances and biotic variables. Conclusions: Shrub abundance responses to abiotic variables rarely aligned with expectations based on plants’ resource acquisition traits or functional groups. Our results, therefore, indicate that approaches exclusively based on resource acquisition traits might be limited in their ability to predict abundances of individual groups and species, particularly in response to complex abiotic environments. However, integrating community theory and functional trait concepts represents a promising pathway to better predict biotic interactions and ultimately responses of dominant shrub vegetation to rapid environmental changes across the arctic tundra biome.
AB - Questions: Shrub vegetation has been expanding across much of the rapidly changing Arctic. Yet, there is still uncertainty about the underlying drivers of shrub community composition. Here, we use extensive vegetation surveys and a trait-based approach to answer the following questions: which abiotic and biotic factors explain abundance of shrub species and functional groups in the Arctic tundra, and can we interpret these relationships using plant traits related to resource acquisition?. Location: Nuup Kangerlua (Godthåbsfjord), western Greenland. Methods: We tested the power of nine climatic, topographic and biotic variables to explain the abundances of nine shrub species using a Bayesian hierarchical modelling framework. Results: We found highly variable responses among species and functional groups to both abiotic and biotic environmental variation. The overall most important abiotic explanatory variable was annual air temperature variability, which was highly correlated with winter minimum air temperature. Functional community composition and graminoid abundance were the most influential biotic factors. While we did not find systematic patterns between shrub abundances and abiotic variables with regard to resource acquisition traits, these traits did explain relationships between shrub abundances and biotic variables. Conclusions: Shrub abundance responses to abiotic variables rarely aligned with expectations based on plants’ resource acquisition traits or functional groups. Our results, therefore, indicate that approaches exclusively based on resource acquisition traits might be limited in their ability to predict abundances of individual groups and species, particularly in response to complex abiotic environments. However, integrating community theory and functional trait concepts represents a promising pathway to better predict biotic interactions and ultimately responses of dominant shrub vegetation to rapid environmental changes across the arctic tundra biome.
KW - Arctic tundra
KW - biotic interactions
KW - gradient
KW - moisture predictors
KW - plant functional groups
KW - plant functional traits
KW - shrubs
KW - species-specificity
KW - temperature variability
KW - vegetation change
U2 - 10.1111/jvs.13009
DO - 10.1111/jvs.13009
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85105073330
VL - 32
JO - Journal of Vegetation Science
JF - Journal of Vegetation Science
SN - 1100-9233
IS - 2
M1 - e13009
ER -
ID: 272114097