Assessment of different screening methods for selecting palaeontological bone samples for peptide sequencing
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Assessment of different screening methods for selecting palaeontological bone samples for peptide sequencing. / Presslee, Samantha; Penkman, Kirsty; Fischer, Roman; Richards-Slidel, Eden; Southon, John; Hospitaleche, Carolina Acosta; Collins, Matthew; MacPhee, Ross.
In: Journal of Proteomics, Vol. 230, 103986, 2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of different screening methods for selecting palaeontological bone samples for peptide sequencing
AU - Presslee, Samantha
AU - Penkman, Kirsty
AU - Fischer, Roman
AU - Richards-Slidel, Eden
AU - Southon, John
AU - Hospitaleche, Carolina Acosta
AU - Collins, Matthew
AU - MacPhee, Ross
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Ancient proteomics is being applied to samples dating further and further back in time, with many palaeontological specimens providing protein sequence data for phylogenetic analysis as well as protein degradation studies. However, fossils are a precious material and proteomic analysis is destructive and costly. In this paper we consider three different techniques (ATR-FTIR, MALDI-ToF MS and chiral AA analysis) to screen fossil material for potential protein preservation, aiming to maximise the proteomic information recovered and saving costly time consuming analyses which may produce low quality results. It was found that splitting factor and C/P indices from ATR-FTIR were not a reliable indicator of protein survival as they are confounded by secondary mineralisation of the fossil material. Both MALDI-ToF MS and chiral AA analysis results were able to successfully identify samples with surviving proteins, and it is suggested that one or both of these analyses be used for screening palaeontological specimens.Significance: This study has shown both chiral amino acid analysis and MALDI-ToF MS are reliable screening methods for predicting protein survival in fossils. Both these methods are quick, cheap, minimally destructive (1 mg and 15 mg respectively) and can provide crucial additional information about the endogeneity of the surviving proteins. It is hoped that the use of these screening methods will encourage the examination of a wide range of palaeontological specimens for potential proteomic analysis. This in turn will give us a better under standing of protein survival far back in time and under different environmental conditions.
AB - Ancient proteomics is being applied to samples dating further and further back in time, with many palaeontological specimens providing protein sequence data for phylogenetic analysis as well as protein degradation studies. However, fossils are a precious material and proteomic analysis is destructive and costly. In this paper we consider three different techniques (ATR-FTIR, MALDI-ToF MS and chiral AA analysis) to screen fossil material for potential protein preservation, aiming to maximise the proteomic information recovered and saving costly time consuming analyses which may produce low quality results. It was found that splitting factor and C/P indices from ATR-FTIR were not a reliable indicator of protein survival as they are confounded by secondary mineralisation of the fossil material. Both MALDI-ToF MS and chiral AA analysis results were able to successfully identify samples with surviving proteins, and it is suggested that one or both of these analyses be used for screening palaeontological specimens.Significance: This study has shown both chiral amino acid analysis and MALDI-ToF MS are reliable screening methods for predicting protein survival in fossils. Both these methods are quick, cheap, minimally destructive (1 mg and 15 mg respectively) and can provide crucial additional information about the endogeneity of the surviving proteins. It is hoped that the use of these screening methods will encourage the examination of a wide range of palaeontological specimens for potential proteomic analysis. This in turn will give us a better under standing of protein survival far back in time and under different environmental conditions.
KW - Palaeoproteomics
KW - MALDI-ToF MS
KW - Chiral AA analysis
KW - ATR-FTIR
KW - Collagen
U2 - 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103986
DO - 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103986
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32941991
VL - 230
JO - Journal of Proteomics
JF - Journal of Proteomics
SN - 1874-3919
M1 - 103986
ER -
ID: 256161611