Developing a framework to improve global estimates of conservation area coverage

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Developing a framework to improve global estimates of conservation area coverage. / Sykes, Rachel E.; O'Neill, Helen M. K.; Juffe-Bignoli, Diego; Metcalfe, Kristian; Stephenson, P. J.; Struebig, Matthew J.; Visconti, Piero; Burgess, Neil D.; Kingston, Naomi; Davies, Zoe G.; Smith, Robert J.

In: Oryx, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2024, p. 192-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Sykes, RE, O'Neill, HMK, Juffe-Bignoli, D, Metcalfe, K, Stephenson, PJ, Struebig, MJ, Visconti, P, Burgess, ND, Kingston, N, Davies, ZG & Smith, RJ 2024, 'Developing a framework to improve global estimates of conservation area coverage', Oryx, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 192-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605323000625

APA

Sykes, R. E., O'Neill, H. M. K., Juffe-Bignoli, D., Metcalfe, K., Stephenson, P. J., Struebig, M. J., Visconti, P., Burgess, N. D., Kingston, N., Davies, Z. G., & Smith, R. J. (2024). Developing a framework to improve global estimates of conservation area coverage. Oryx, 58(2), 192-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605323000625

Vancouver

Sykes RE, O'Neill HMK, Juffe-Bignoli D, Metcalfe K, Stephenson PJ, Struebig MJ et al. Developing a framework to improve global estimates of conservation area coverage. Oryx. 2024;58(2):192-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605323000625

Author

Sykes, Rachel E. ; O'Neill, Helen M. K. ; Juffe-Bignoli, Diego ; Metcalfe, Kristian ; Stephenson, P. J. ; Struebig, Matthew J. ; Visconti, Piero ; Burgess, Neil D. ; Kingston, Naomi ; Davies, Zoe G. ; Smith, Robert J. / Developing a framework to improve global estimates of conservation area coverage. In: Oryx. 2024 ; Vol. 58, No. 2. pp. 192-201.

Bibtex

@article{3784a1f02eea44578cf1a60765313ab0,
title = "Developing a framework to improve global estimates of conservation area coverage",
abstract = "Area-based conservation is a widely used approach for maintaining biodiversity, and there are ongoing discussions over what is an appropriate global conservation area coverage target. To inform such debates, it is necessary to know the extent and ecological representativeness of the current conservation area network, but this is hampered by gaps in existing global datasets. In particular, although data on privately and community-governed protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures are often available at the national level, it can take many years to incorporate these into official datasets. This suggests a complementary approach is needed based on selecting a sample of countries and using their national-scale datasets to produce more accurate metrics. However, every country added to the sample increases the costs of data collection, collation and analysis. To address this, here we present a data collection framework underpinned by a spatial prioritization algorithm, which identifies a minimum set of countries that are also representative of 10 factors that influence conservation area establishment and biodiversity patterns. We then illustrate this approach by identifying a representative set of sampling units that cover 10% of the terrestrial realm, which included areas in only 25 countries. In contrast, selecting 10% of the terrestrial realm at random included areas across a mean of 162 countries. These sampling units could be the focus of future data collation on different types of conservation area. Analysing these data could produce more rapid and accurate estimates of global conservation area coverage and ecological representativeness, complementing existing international reporting systems. ",
keywords = "Conservation areas, conservation targets, Global Biodiversity Framework Target 3, OECM, other effective area-based conservation measures, protected areas",
author = "Sykes, {Rachel E.} and O'Neill, {Helen M. K.} and Diego Juffe-Bignoli and Kristian Metcalfe and Stephenson, {P. J.} and Struebig, {Matthew J.} and Piero Visconti and Burgess, {Neil D.} and Naomi Kingston and Davies, {Zoe G.} and Smith, {Robert J.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1017/S0030605323000625",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "192--201",
journal = "Oryx",
issn = "0030-6053",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing a framework to improve global estimates of conservation area coverage

AU - Sykes, Rachel E.

AU - O'Neill, Helen M. K.

AU - Juffe-Bignoli, Diego

AU - Metcalfe, Kristian

AU - Stephenson, P. J.

AU - Struebig, Matthew J.

AU - Visconti, Piero

AU - Burgess, Neil D.

AU - Kingston, Naomi

AU - Davies, Zoe G.

AU - Smith, Robert J.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Area-based conservation is a widely used approach for maintaining biodiversity, and there are ongoing discussions over what is an appropriate global conservation area coverage target. To inform such debates, it is necessary to know the extent and ecological representativeness of the current conservation area network, but this is hampered by gaps in existing global datasets. In particular, although data on privately and community-governed protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures are often available at the national level, it can take many years to incorporate these into official datasets. This suggests a complementary approach is needed based on selecting a sample of countries and using their national-scale datasets to produce more accurate metrics. However, every country added to the sample increases the costs of data collection, collation and analysis. To address this, here we present a data collection framework underpinned by a spatial prioritization algorithm, which identifies a minimum set of countries that are also representative of 10 factors that influence conservation area establishment and biodiversity patterns. We then illustrate this approach by identifying a representative set of sampling units that cover 10% of the terrestrial realm, which included areas in only 25 countries. In contrast, selecting 10% of the terrestrial realm at random included areas across a mean of 162 countries. These sampling units could be the focus of future data collation on different types of conservation area. Analysing these data could produce more rapid and accurate estimates of global conservation area coverage and ecological representativeness, complementing existing international reporting systems.

AB - Area-based conservation is a widely used approach for maintaining biodiversity, and there are ongoing discussions over what is an appropriate global conservation area coverage target. To inform such debates, it is necessary to know the extent and ecological representativeness of the current conservation area network, but this is hampered by gaps in existing global datasets. In particular, although data on privately and community-governed protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures are often available at the national level, it can take many years to incorporate these into official datasets. This suggests a complementary approach is needed based on selecting a sample of countries and using their national-scale datasets to produce more accurate metrics. However, every country added to the sample increases the costs of data collection, collation and analysis. To address this, here we present a data collection framework underpinned by a spatial prioritization algorithm, which identifies a minimum set of countries that are also representative of 10 factors that influence conservation area establishment and biodiversity patterns. We then illustrate this approach by identifying a representative set of sampling units that cover 10% of the terrestrial realm, which included areas in only 25 countries. In contrast, selecting 10% of the terrestrial realm at random included areas across a mean of 162 countries. These sampling units could be the focus of future data collation on different types of conservation area. Analysing these data could produce more rapid and accurate estimates of global conservation area coverage and ecological representativeness, complementing existing international reporting systems.

KW - Conservation areas

KW - conservation targets

KW - Global Biodiversity Framework Target 3

KW - OECM

KW - other effective area-based conservation measures

KW - protected areas

U2 - 10.1017/S0030605323000625

DO - 10.1017/S0030605323000625

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85176610188

VL - 58

SP - 192

EP - 201

JO - Oryx

JF - Oryx

SN - 0030-6053

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 373787695