Field and laboratory guidelines for reliable bioinformatic and statistical analysis of bacterial shotgun metagenomic data

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Field and laboratory guidelines for reliable bioinformatic and statistical analysis of bacterial shotgun metagenomic data. / Aizpurua, Ostaizka; Dunn, Robert R.; Hansen, Lars H.; Gilbert, M. T. P.; Alberdi, Antton.

In: Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Aizpurua, O, Dunn, RR, Hansen, LH, Gilbert, MTP & Alberdi, A 2024, 'Field and laboratory guidelines for reliable bioinformatic and statistical analysis of bacterial shotgun metagenomic data', Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2023.2254933

APA

Aizpurua, O., Dunn, R. R., Hansen, L. H., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Alberdi, A. (2024). Field and laboratory guidelines for reliable bioinformatic and statistical analysis of bacterial shotgun metagenomic data. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2023.2254933

Vancouver

Aizpurua O, Dunn RR, Hansen LH, Gilbert MTP, Alberdi A. Field and laboratory guidelines for reliable bioinformatic and statistical analysis of bacterial shotgun metagenomic data. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2023.2254933

Author

Aizpurua, Ostaizka ; Dunn, Robert R. ; Hansen, Lars H. ; Gilbert, M. T. P. ; Alberdi, Antton. / Field and laboratory guidelines for reliable bioinformatic and statistical analysis of bacterial shotgun metagenomic data. In: Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{115a22a958a54c60ac56d224af644975,
title = "Field and laboratory guidelines for reliable bioinformatic and statistical analysis of bacterial shotgun metagenomic data",
abstract = "Shotgun metagenomics is an increasingly cost-effective approach for profiling environmental and host-associated microbial communities. However, due to the complexity of both microbiomes and the molecular techniques required to analyze them, the reliability and representativeness of the results are contingent upon the field, laboratory, and bioinformatic procedures employed. Here, we consider 15 field and laboratory issues that critically impact downstream bioinformatic and statistical data processing, as well as result interpretation, in bacterial shotgun metagenomic studies. The issues we consider encompass intrinsic properties of samples, study design, and laboratory-processing strategies. We identify the links of field and laboratory steps with downstream analytical procedures, explain the means for detecting potential pitfalls, and propose mitigation measures to overcome or minimize their impact in metagenomic studies. We anticipate that our guidelines will assist data scientists in appropriately processing and interpreting their data, while aiding field and laboratory researchers to implement strategies for improving the quality of the generated results.",
keywords = "Batch effect, bias, contamination, controls, extraction, library preparation, metagenome, microbiology, microbiome, study design",
author = "Ostaizka Aizpurua and Dunn, {Robert R.} and Hansen, {Lars H.} and Gilbert, {M. T. P.} and Antton Alberdi",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1080/07388551.2023.2254933",
language = "English",
journal = "Critical Reviews in Biotechnology",
issn = "0738-8551",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field and laboratory guidelines for reliable bioinformatic and statistical analysis of bacterial shotgun metagenomic data

AU - Aizpurua, Ostaizka

AU - Dunn, Robert R.

AU - Hansen, Lars H.

AU - Gilbert, M. T. P.

AU - Alberdi, Antton

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Shotgun metagenomics is an increasingly cost-effective approach for profiling environmental and host-associated microbial communities. However, due to the complexity of both microbiomes and the molecular techniques required to analyze them, the reliability and representativeness of the results are contingent upon the field, laboratory, and bioinformatic procedures employed. Here, we consider 15 field and laboratory issues that critically impact downstream bioinformatic and statistical data processing, as well as result interpretation, in bacterial shotgun metagenomic studies. The issues we consider encompass intrinsic properties of samples, study design, and laboratory-processing strategies. We identify the links of field and laboratory steps with downstream analytical procedures, explain the means for detecting potential pitfalls, and propose mitigation measures to overcome or minimize their impact in metagenomic studies. We anticipate that our guidelines will assist data scientists in appropriately processing and interpreting their data, while aiding field and laboratory researchers to implement strategies for improving the quality of the generated results.

AB - Shotgun metagenomics is an increasingly cost-effective approach for profiling environmental and host-associated microbial communities. However, due to the complexity of both microbiomes and the molecular techniques required to analyze them, the reliability and representativeness of the results are contingent upon the field, laboratory, and bioinformatic procedures employed. Here, we consider 15 field and laboratory issues that critically impact downstream bioinformatic and statistical data processing, as well as result interpretation, in bacterial shotgun metagenomic studies. The issues we consider encompass intrinsic properties of samples, study design, and laboratory-processing strategies. We identify the links of field and laboratory steps with downstream analytical procedures, explain the means for detecting potential pitfalls, and propose mitigation measures to overcome or minimize their impact in metagenomic studies. We anticipate that our guidelines will assist data scientists in appropriately processing and interpreting their data, while aiding field and laboratory researchers to implement strategies for improving the quality of the generated results.

KW - Batch effect

KW - bias

KW - contamination

KW - controls

KW - extraction

KW - library preparation

KW - metagenome

KW - microbiology

KW - microbiome

KW - study design

U2 - 10.1080/07388551.2023.2254933

DO - 10.1080/07388551.2023.2254933

M3 - Review

C2 - 37731336

AN - SCOPUS:85171643336

JO - Critical Reviews in Biotechnology

JF - Critical Reviews in Biotechnology

SN - 0738-8551

ER -

ID: 368807495