Reconsidering domestication from a process archaeology perspective
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Reconsidering domestication from a process archaeology perspective. / Bogaard, Amy; Allaby, Robin; Arbuckle, Benjamin S.; Bendrey, Robin; Crowley, Sarah; Cucchi, Thomas; Denham, Tim; Frantz, Laurent; Fuller, Dorian; Gilbert, Tom; Karlsson, Elinor; Manin, Aurélie; Marshall, Fiona; Mueller, Natalie; Peters, Joris; Stépanoff, Charles; Weide, Alexander; Larson, Greger.
In: World Archaeology, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2021, p. 56-77.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconsidering domestication from a process archaeology perspective
AU - Bogaard, Amy
AU - Allaby, Robin
AU - Arbuckle, Benjamin S.
AU - Bendrey, Robin
AU - Crowley, Sarah
AU - Cucchi, Thomas
AU - Denham, Tim
AU - Frantz, Laurent
AU - Fuller, Dorian
AU - Gilbert, Tom
AU - Karlsson, Elinor
AU - Manin, Aurélie
AU - Marshall, Fiona
AU - Mueller, Natalie
AU - Peters, Joris
AU - Stépanoff, Charles
AU - Weide, Alexander
AU - Larson, Greger
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Process philosophy offers a metaphysical foundation for domestication studies. This grounding is especially important given the European colonialist origin of ‘domestication’ as a term and 19th century cultural project. We explore the potential of process archaeology for deep-time investigation of domestication relationships, drawing attention to the variable pace of domestication as an ongoing process within and across taxa; the nature of domestication ‘syndromes’ and ‘pathways’ as general hypotheses about process; the importance of cooperation as well as competition among humans and other organisms; the significance of non-human agency; and the ubiquity of hybrid communities that resist the simple wild/domestic dichotomy.
AB - Process philosophy offers a metaphysical foundation for domestication studies. This grounding is especially important given the European colonialist origin of ‘domestication’ as a term and 19th century cultural project. We explore the potential of process archaeology for deep-time investigation of domestication relationships, drawing attention to the variable pace of domestication as an ongoing process within and across taxa; the nature of domestication ‘syndromes’ and ‘pathways’ as general hypotheses about process; the importance of cooperation as well as competition among humans and other organisms; the significance of non-human agency; and the ubiquity of hybrid communities that resist the simple wild/domestic dichotomy.
KW - agriculture
KW - Domestication
KW - herding
KW - hybridity
KW - niche
KW - process
U2 - 10.1080/00438243.2021.1954990
DO - 10.1080/00438243.2021.1954990
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85113545718
VL - 53
SP - 56
EP - 77
JO - World Archaeology
JF - World Archaeology
SN - 0043-8243
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 279625646