Resurvey of Antisana supports overall conclusions of Chimborazo study

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review

Standard

Resurvey of Antisana supports overall conclusions of Chimborazo study. / Morueta-Holme, Naia; Jensen, Kristine Engemann; Sandoval-Acuña, Pablo; Jonas, Jeremy D.; Segnitz, R. Max; Svenning, Jens-Christian.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 116, No. 43, 2019, p. 21346-21347.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Morueta-Holme, N, Jensen, KE, Sandoval-Acuña, P, Jonas, JD, Segnitz, RM & Svenning, J-C 2019, 'Resurvey of Antisana supports overall conclusions of Chimborazo study', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 116, no. 43, pp. 21346-21347. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911597116

APA

Morueta-Holme, N., Jensen, K. E., Sandoval-Acuña, P., Jonas, J. D., Segnitz, R. M., & Svenning, J-C. (2019). Resurvey of Antisana supports overall conclusions of Chimborazo study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(43), 21346-21347. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911597116

Vancouver

Morueta-Holme N, Jensen KE, Sandoval-Acuña P, Jonas JD, Segnitz RM, Svenning J-C. Resurvey of Antisana supports overall conclusions of Chimborazo study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019;116(43):21346-21347. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911597116

Author

Morueta-Holme, Naia ; Jensen, Kristine Engemann ; Sandoval-Acuña, Pablo ; Jonas, Jeremy D. ; Segnitz, R. Max ; Svenning, Jens-Christian. / Resurvey of Antisana supports overall conclusions of Chimborazo study. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019 ; Vol. 116, No. 43. pp. 21346-21347.

Bibtex

@article{ac789005c9744909a16ffb2751c2ac2c,
title = "Resurvey of Antisana supports overall conclusions of Chimborazo study",
abstract = "Using historical data to infer temporal biotic changes is challenging (1). We are surprised that Moret et al. claim there is a “generalized misinterpretation” of Humboldt{\textquoteright}s Tableau Physique des Andes et Pays Voisins as representing the vegetation of Chimborazo only. The >6-km elevation span of the figure, the title, and Humboldt{\textquoteright}s descriptions, show the Tableau includes information from the surrounding Andes—a fact we highlighted in our publication{\textquoteright}s abstract (2). We used data from the figure with 4 other sources of historical elevation ranges, considering in detail inconsistencies and uncertainties in Humboldt{\textquoteright}s accounts. Sensitivity analyses across accounts supported the robustness of our conclusions on Chimborazo range shifts (2). Moret et al. claim lacking preserved specimens show that Humboldt did not collect plants … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: morueta-holme{at}snm.ku.dk. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1",
author = "Naia Morueta-Holme and Jensen, {Kristine Engemann} and Pablo Sandoval-Acu{\~n}a and Jonas, {Jeremy D.} and Segnitz, {R. Max} and Jens-Christian Svenning",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1911597116",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "21346--21347",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
number = "43",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resurvey of Antisana supports overall conclusions of Chimborazo study

AU - Morueta-Holme, Naia

AU - Jensen, Kristine Engemann

AU - Sandoval-Acuña, Pablo

AU - Jonas, Jeremy D.

AU - Segnitz, R. Max

AU - Svenning, Jens-Christian

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Using historical data to infer temporal biotic changes is challenging (1). We are surprised that Moret et al. claim there is a “generalized misinterpretation” of Humboldt’s Tableau Physique des Andes et Pays Voisins as representing the vegetation of Chimborazo only. The >6-km elevation span of the figure, the title, and Humboldt’s descriptions, show the Tableau includes information from the surrounding Andes—a fact we highlighted in our publication’s abstract (2). We used data from the figure with 4 other sources of historical elevation ranges, considering in detail inconsistencies and uncertainties in Humboldt’s accounts. Sensitivity analyses across accounts supported the robustness of our conclusions on Chimborazo range shifts (2). Moret et al. claim lacking preserved specimens show that Humboldt did not collect plants … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: morueta-holme{at}snm.ku.dk. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

AB - Using historical data to infer temporal biotic changes is challenging (1). We are surprised that Moret et al. claim there is a “generalized misinterpretation” of Humboldt’s Tableau Physique des Andes et Pays Voisins as representing the vegetation of Chimborazo only. The >6-km elevation span of the figure, the title, and Humboldt’s descriptions, show the Tableau includes information from the surrounding Andes—a fact we highlighted in our publication’s abstract (2). We used data from the figure with 4 other sources of historical elevation ranges, considering in detail inconsistencies and uncertainties in Humboldt’s accounts. Sensitivity analyses across accounts supported the robustness of our conclusions on Chimborazo range shifts (2). Moret et al. claim lacking preserved specimens show that Humboldt did not collect plants … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: morueta-holme{at}snm.ku.dk. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1911597116

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1911597116

M3 - Letter

C2 - 31575736

VL - 116

SP - 21346

EP - 21347

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 43

ER -

ID: 229370951