The positive impact of conservation action

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Penny F. Langhammer
  • Joseph W. Bull
  • Jake E. Bicknell
  • Joseph L. Oakley
  • Mary H. Brown
  • Michael W. Bruford
  • Stuart H. M. Butchart
  • Jamie A. Carr
  • Don Church
  • Rosie Cooney
  • Simone Cutajar
  • Wendy Foden
  • Matthew N. Foster
  • Claude Gascon
  • Piero Genovesi
  • Michael Hoffmann
  • Jo Howard-McCombe
  • Tiffany Lewis
  • Nicholas B. W. Macfarlane
  • Zoe E. Melvin
  • Rossana Stoltz Merizalde
  • Meredith G. Morehouse
  • Shyama Pagad
  • Beth Polidoro
  • Wes Sechrest
  • Gernot Segelbacher
  • Kevin G. Smith
  • Janna Steadman
  • Kyle Strongin
  • Jake Williams
  • Stephen Woodley
  • Thomas M. Brooks

Governments recently adopted new global targets to halt and reverse the loss of biodiversity. It is therefore crucial to understand the outcomes of conservation actions. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 186 studies (including 665 trials) that measured biodiversity over time and compared outcomes under conservation action with a suitable counterfactual of no action. We find that in two-thirds of cases, conservation either improved the state of biodiversity or at least slowed declines. Specifically, we find that interventions targeted at species and ecosystems, such as invasive species control, habitat loss reduction and restoration, protected areas, and sustainable management, are highly effective and have large effect sizes. This provides the strongest evidence to date that conservation actions are successful but require transformational scaling up to meet global targets.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScience
Volume384
Issue number6694
Pages (from-to)453-458
Number of pages6
ISSN0036-8075
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights reserved.

ID: 400745679