A guide to ancient protein studies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

A guide to ancient protein studies. / Hendy, Jessica; Welker, Frido; Demarchi, Beatrice; Speller, Camilla; Warinner, Christina; Collins, Matthew James.

In: Nature Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 2, 2018, p. 791-799.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hendy, J, Welker, F, Demarchi, B, Speller, C, Warinner, C & Collins, MJ 2018, 'A guide to ancient protein studies', Nature Ecology & Evolution, vol. 2, pp. 791-799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x

APA

Hendy, J., Welker, F., Demarchi, B., Speller, C., Warinner, C., & Collins, M. J. (2018). A guide to ancient protein studies. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 791-799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x

Vancouver

Hendy J, Welker F, Demarchi B, Speller C, Warinner C, Collins MJ. A guide to ancient protein studies. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2018;2:791-799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x

Author

Hendy, Jessica ; Welker, Frido ; Demarchi, Beatrice ; Speller, Camilla ; Warinner, Christina ; Collins, Matthew James. / A guide to ancient protein studies. In: Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2018 ; Vol. 2. pp. 791-799.

Bibtex

@article{64d516a557a94ab990024b69bd243cc1,
title = "A guide to ancient protein studies",
abstract = "Palaeoproteomics is an emerging neologism used to describe the application of mass spectrometry-based approaches to the study of ancient proteomes. As with palaeogenomics (the study of ancient DNA), it intersects evolutionary biology, archaeology and anthropology, with applications ranging from the phylogenetic reconstruction of extinct species to the investigation of past human diets and ancient diseases. However, there is no explicit consensus at present regarding standards for data reporting, data validation measures or the use of suitable contamination controls in ancient protein studies. Additionally, in contrast to the ancient DNA community, no consolidated guidelines have been proposed by which researchers, reviewers and editors can evaluate palaeoproteomics data, in part due to the novelty of the field. Here we present a series of precautions and standards for ancient protein research that can be implemented at each stage of analysis, from sample selection to data interpretation. These guidelines are not intended to impose a narrow or rigid list of authentication criteria, but rather to support good practices in the field and to ensure the generation of robust, reproducible results. As the field grows and methodologies change, so too will best practices. It is therefore essential that researchers continue to provide necessary details on how data were generated and authenticated so that the results can be independently and effectively evaluated. We hope that these proposed standards of practice will help to provide a firm foundation for the establishment of palaeoproteomics as a viable and powerful tool for archaeologists, anthropologists and evolutionary biologists.",
author = "Jessica Hendy and Frido Welker and Beatrice Demarchi and Camilla Speller and Christina Warinner and Collins, {Matthew James}",
note = "Author correction: DOI 10.1038/s41559-018-0590-7",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "791--799",
journal = "Nature Ecology & Evolution",
issn = "2397-334X",
publisher = "nature publishing group",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A guide to ancient protein studies

AU - Hendy, Jessica

AU - Welker, Frido

AU - Demarchi, Beatrice

AU - Speller, Camilla

AU - Warinner, Christina

AU - Collins, Matthew James

N1 - Author correction: DOI 10.1038/s41559-018-0590-7

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Palaeoproteomics is an emerging neologism used to describe the application of mass spectrometry-based approaches to the study of ancient proteomes. As with palaeogenomics (the study of ancient DNA), it intersects evolutionary biology, archaeology and anthropology, with applications ranging from the phylogenetic reconstruction of extinct species to the investigation of past human diets and ancient diseases. However, there is no explicit consensus at present regarding standards for data reporting, data validation measures or the use of suitable contamination controls in ancient protein studies. Additionally, in contrast to the ancient DNA community, no consolidated guidelines have been proposed by which researchers, reviewers and editors can evaluate palaeoproteomics data, in part due to the novelty of the field. Here we present a series of precautions and standards for ancient protein research that can be implemented at each stage of analysis, from sample selection to data interpretation. These guidelines are not intended to impose a narrow or rigid list of authentication criteria, but rather to support good practices in the field and to ensure the generation of robust, reproducible results. As the field grows and methodologies change, so too will best practices. It is therefore essential that researchers continue to provide necessary details on how data were generated and authenticated so that the results can be independently and effectively evaluated. We hope that these proposed standards of practice will help to provide a firm foundation for the establishment of palaeoproteomics as a viable and powerful tool for archaeologists, anthropologists and evolutionary biologists.

AB - Palaeoproteomics is an emerging neologism used to describe the application of mass spectrometry-based approaches to the study of ancient proteomes. As with palaeogenomics (the study of ancient DNA), it intersects evolutionary biology, archaeology and anthropology, with applications ranging from the phylogenetic reconstruction of extinct species to the investigation of past human diets and ancient diseases. However, there is no explicit consensus at present regarding standards for data reporting, data validation measures or the use of suitable contamination controls in ancient protein studies. Additionally, in contrast to the ancient DNA community, no consolidated guidelines have been proposed by which researchers, reviewers and editors can evaluate palaeoproteomics data, in part due to the novelty of the field. Here we present a series of precautions and standards for ancient protein research that can be implemented at each stage of analysis, from sample selection to data interpretation. These guidelines are not intended to impose a narrow or rigid list of authentication criteria, but rather to support good practices in the field and to ensure the generation of robust, reproducible results. As the field grows and methodologies change, so too will best practices. It is therefore essential that researchers continue to provide necessary details on how data were generated and authenticated so that the results can be independently and effectively evaluated. We hope that these proposed standards of practice will help to provide a firm foundation for the establishment of palaeoproteomics as a viable and powerful tool for archaeologists, anthropologists and evolutionary biologists.

UR - http://10.1038/s41559-018-0590-7

U2 - 10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x

DO - 10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29581591

VL - 2

SP - 791

EP - 799

JO - Nature Ecology & Evolution

JF - Nature Ecology & Evolution

SN - 2397-334X

ER -

ID: 194248001