Developing an outcomes-based approach to achieving Target 3 of the Global Biodiversity Framework

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Developing an outcomes-based approach to achieving Target 3 of the Global Biodiversity Framework. / Dudley, Nigel; Robinson, John G.; Andelman, Sandy; Bingham, Heather C.; Conzo, Lori Anna; Geldmann, Jonas; Grorud-Colvert, Kirsten; Gurney, Georgina G.; Hickey, Valerie; Hockings, Marc; Jonas, Harry D.; Kettunen, Marianne; Marnewick, Daniel; Masozera, Michel ; Mitchell, L Brent; Parrish, Jeffrey; Redford, Kent; Espinoza, Andrew Rhodes; Russi, Daniel; Salafsky, Nick; Springer, Jenny; Sullivan-Stack, Jenna; Tugendhat, Helen; Watson, James E. M.; Wilkie, David S.; Woodley, Stephen.

In: Parks, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2022, p. 33-44.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Dudley, N, Robinson, JG, Andelman, S, Bingham, HC, Conzo, LA, Geldmann, J, Grorud-Colvert, K, Gurney, GG, Hickey, V, Hockings, M, Jonas, HD, Kettunen, M, Marnewick, D, Masozera, M, Mitchell, LB, Parrish, J, Redford, K, Espinoza, AR, Russi, D, Salafsky, N, Springer, J, Sullivan-Stack, J, Tugendhat, H, Watson, JEM, Wilkie, DS & Woodley, S 2022, 'Developing an outcomes-based approach to achieving Target 3 of the Global Biodiversity Framework', Parks, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 33-44. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2022.PARKS-28-2ND.en

APA

Dudley, N., Robinson, J. G., Andelman, S., Bingham, H. C., Conzo, L. A., Geldmann, J., Grorud-Colvert, K., Gurney, G. G., Hickey, V., Hockings, M., Jonas, H. D., Kettunen, M., Marnewick, D., Masozera, M., Mitchell, L. B., Parrish, J., Redford, K., Espinoza, A. R., Russi, D., ... Woodley, S. (2022). Developing an outcomes-based approach to achieving Target 3 of the Global Biodiversity Framework. Parks, 28(2), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2022.PARKS-28-2ND.en

Vancouver

Dudley N, Robinson JG, Andelman S, Bingham HC, Conzo LA, Geldmann J et al. Developing an outcomes-based approach to achieving Target 3 of the Global Biodiversity Framework. Parks. 2022;28(2):33-44. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2022.PARKS-28-2ND.en

Author

Dudley, Nigel ; Robinson, John G. ; Andelman, Sandy ; Bingham, Heather C. ; Conzo, Lori Anna ; Geldmann, Jonas ; Grorud-Colvert, Kirsten ; Gurney, Georgina G. ; Hickey, Valerie ; Hockings, Marc ; Jonas, Harry D. ; Kettunen, Marianne ; Marnewick, Daniel ; Masozera, Michel ; Mitchell, L Brent ; Parrish, Jeffrey ; Redford, Kent ; Espinoza, Andrew Rhodes ; Russi, Daniel ; Salafsky, Nick ; Springer, Jenny ; Sullivan-Stack, Jenna ; Tugendhat, Helen ; Watson, James E. M. ; Wilkie, David S. ; Woodley, Stephen. / Developing an outcomes-based approach to achieving Target 3 of the Global Biodiversity Framework. In: Parks. 2022 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 33-44.

Bibtex

@article{f18928565ded4983b7c5c91cdc022ba0,
title = "Developing an outcomes-based approach to achieving Target 3 of the Global Biodiversity Framework",
abstract = "The draft Global Biodiversity Framework proposes to increase protected areas and OECMs to at least 30 per cent of land and ocean by 2030 (30x30). Such areas are central to conservation, but only if effectively managed and equitably governed. In practice, governments often recognise areas that do not achieve successful outcomes or respect human rights and fail to recognise other effective governance systems. We argue that protected areas and OECMs should only be recognised as fully contributing to 30x30 if they are on track to achieve positive and sustained biodiversity outcomes while respecting human rights. Three principles are important: • Delivery of positive outcomes relating to biodiversity; • Recognition and respect for rights-holders and stakeholders living in or near the area or dependent on its natural resources; and • Meeting human needs through ecosystem services. Four levels in making progress towards Target 3 can be distinguished: 1. Areas that are currently fully effective; 2. Areas that are currently partially effective or on track to being effective; 3. Areas that are currently ineffective due to reversible issues; and 4. Areas that are currently and will continue to be ineffective due to irreversible issues. Some policy implications of this typology, its strengths and weaknesses, and how it might be further developed are discussed",
author = "Nigel Dudley and Robinson, {John G.} and Sandy Andelman and Bingham, {Heather C.} and Conzo, {Lori Anna} and Jonas Geldmann and Kirsten Grorud-Colvert and Gurney, {Georgina G.} and Valerie Hickey and Marc Hockings and Jonas, {Harry D.} and Marianne Kettunen and Daniel Marnewick and Michel Masozera and Mitchell, {L Brent} and Jeffrey Parrish and Kent Redford and Espinoza, {Andrew Rhodes} and Daniel Russi and Nick Salafsky and Jenny Springer and Jenna Sullivan-Stack and Helen Tugendhat and Watson, {James E. M.} and Wilkie, {David S.} and Stephen Woodley",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.2305/IUCN.CH.2022.PARKS-28-2ND.en",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "33--44",
journal = "Parks",
issn = "0960-233X",
publisher = "World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) of IUCN –",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing an outcomes-based approach to achieving Target 3 of the Global Biodiversity Framework

AU - Dudley, Nigel

AU - Robinson, John G.

AU - Andelman, Sandy

AU - Bingham, Heather C.

AU - Conzo, Lori Anna

AU - Geldmann, Jonas

AU - Grorud-Colvert, Kirsten

AU - Gurney, Georgina G.

AU - Hickey, Valerie

AU - Hockings, Marc

AU - Jonas, Harry D.

AU - Kettunen, Marianne

AU - Marnewick, Daniel

AU - Masozera, Michel

AU - Mitchell, L Brent

AU - Parrish, Jeffrey

AU - Redford, Kent

AU - Espinoza, Andrew Rhodes

AU - Russi, Daniel

AU - Salafsky, Nick

AU - Springer, Jenny

AU - Sullivan-Stack, Jenna

AU - Tugendhat, Helen

AU - Watson, James E. M.

AU - Wilkie, David S.

AU - Woodley, Stephen

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The draft Global Biodiversity Framework proposes to increase protected areas and OECMs to at least 30 per cent of land and ocean by 2030 (30x30). Such areas are central to conservation, but only if effectively managed and equitably governed. In practice, governments often recognise areas that do not achieve successful outcomes or respect human rights and fail to recognise other effective governance systems. We argue that protected areas and OECMs should only be recognised as fully contributing to 30x30 if they are on track to achieve positive and sustained biodiversity outcomes while respecting human rights. Three principles are important: • Delivery of positive outcomes relating to biodiversity; • Recognition and respect for rights-holders and stakeholders living in or near the area or dependent on its natural resources; and • Meeting human needs through ecosystem services. Four levels in making progress towards Target 3 can be distinguished: 1. Areas that are currently fully effective; 2. Areas that are currently partially effective or on track to being effective; 3. Areas that are currently ineffective due to reversible issues; and 4. Areas that are currently and will continue to be ineffective due to irreversible issues. Some policy implications of this typology, its strengths and weaknesses, and how it might be further developed are discussed

AB - The draft Global Biodiversity Framework proposes to increase protected areas and OECMs to at least 30 per cent of land and ocean by 2030 (30x30). Such areas are central to conservation, but only if effectively managed and equitably governed. In practice, governments often recognise areas that do not achieve successful outcomes or respect human rights and fail to recognise other effective governance systems. We argue that protected areas and OECMs should only be recognised as fully contributing to 30x30 if they are on track to achieve positive and sustained biodiversity outcomes while respecting human rights. Three principles are important: • Delivery of positive outcomes relating to biodiversity; • Recognition and respect for rights-holders and stakeholders living in or near the area or dependent on its natural resources; and • Meeting human needs through ecosystem services. Four levels in making progress towards Target 3 can be distinguished: 1. Areas that are currently fully effective; 2. Areas that are currently partially effective or on track to being effective; 3. Areas that are currently ineffective due to reversible issues; and 4. Areas that are currently and will continue to be ineffective due to irreversible issues. Some policy implications of this typology, its strengths and weaknesses, and how it might be further developed are discussed

U2 - 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2022.PARKS-28-2ND.en

DO - 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2022.PARKS-28-2ND.en

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 33

EP - 44

JO - Parks

JF - Parks

SN - 0960-233X

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 332037432