Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change : a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. / Swetnam, R D; Fisher, B; Mbilinyi, B P; Munishi, P K T; Willcock, S; Ricketts, T; Mwakalila, S; Balmford, A; Burgess, N D; Marshall, A R; Lewis, S L.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2011, p. 563-574.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Swetnam, RD, Fisher, B, Mbilinyi, BP, Munishi, PKT, Willcock, S, Ricketts, T, Mwakalila, S, Balmford, A, Burgess, ND, Marshall, AR & Lewis, SL 2011, 'Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling', Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 563-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.007

APA

Swetnam, R. D., Fisher, B., Mbilinyi, B. P., Munishi, P. K. T., Willcock, S., Ricketts, T., Mwakalila, S., Balmford, A., Burgess, N. D., Marshall, A. R., & Lewis, S. L. (2011). Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 563-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.007

Vancouver

Swetnam RD, Fisher B, Mbilinyi BP, Munishi PKT, Willcock S, Ricketts T et al. Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. Journal of Environmental Management. 2011;92(3):563-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.007

Author

Swetnam, R D ; Fisher, B ; Mbilinyi, B P ; Munishi, P K T ; Willcock, S ; Ricketts, T ; Mwakalila, S ; Balmford, A ; Burgess, N D ; Marshall, A R ; Lewis, S L. / Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change : a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. In: Journal of Environmental Management. 2011 ; Vol. 92, No. 3. pp. 563-574.

Bibtex

@article{05ce1a8db6d247f8b24197b6224496bd,
title = "Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling",
abstract = "We present a GIS method to interpret qualitatively expressed socio-economic scenarios in quantitative map-based terms. (i) We built scenarios using local stakeholders and experts to define how major land cover classes may change under different sets of drivers; (ii) we formalized these as spatially explicit rules, for example agriculture can only occur on certain soil types; (iii) we created a future land cover map which can then be used to model ecosystem services. We illustrate this for carbon storage in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania using two scenarios: the first based on sustainable development, the second based on 'business as usual' with continued forest-woodland degradation and poor protection of existing forest reserves. Between 2000 and 2025 4% of carbon stocks were lost under the first scenario compared to a loss of 41% of carbon stocks under the second scenario. Quantifying the impacts of differing future scenarios using the method we document here will be important if payments for ecosystem services are to be used to change policy in order to maintain critical ecosystem services.",
keywords = "Ecosystem, Geographic Information Systems, Models, Theoretical, Socioeconomic Factors, Tanzania",
author = "Swetnam, {R D} and B Fisher and Mbilinyi, {B P} and Munishi, {P K T} and S Willcock and T Ricketts and S Mwakalila and A Balmford and Burgess, {N D} and Marshall, {A R} and Lewis, {S L}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.007",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "563--574",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Academic Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change

T2 - a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling

AU - Swetnam, R D

AU - Fisher, B

AU - Mbilinyi, B P

AU - Munishi, P K T

AU - Willcock, S

AU - Ricketts, T

AU - Mwakalila, S

AU - Balmford, A

AU - Burgess, N D

AU - Marshall, A R

AU - Lewis, S L

N1 - Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - We present a GIS method to interpret qualitatively expressed socio-economic scenarios in quantitative map-based terms. (i) We built scenarios using local stakeholders and experts to define how major land cover classes may change under different sets of drivers; (ii) we formalized these as spatially explicit rules, for example agriculture can only occur on certain soil types; (iii) we created a future land cover map which can then be used to model ecosystem services. We illustrate this for carbon storage in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania using two scenarios: the first based on sustainable development, the second based on 'business as usual' with continued forest-woodland degradation and poor protection of existing forest reserves. Between 2000 and 2025 4% of carbon stocks were lost under the first scenario compared to a loss of 41% of carbon stocks under the second scenario. Quantifying the impacts of differing future scenarios using the method we document here will be important if payments for ecosystem services are to be used to change policy in order to maintain critical ecosystem services.

AB - We present a GIS method to interpret qualitatively expressed socio-economic scenarios in quantitative map-based terms. (i) We built scenarios using local stakeholders and experts to define how major land cover classes may change under different sets of drivers; (ii) we formalized these as spatially explicit rules, for example agriculture can only occur on certain soil types; (iii) we created a future land cover map which can then be used to model ecosystem services. We illustrate this for carbon storage in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania using two scenarios: the first based on sustainable development, the second based on 'business as usual' with continued forest-woodland degradation and poor protection of existing forest reserves. Between 2000 and 2025 4% of carbon stocks were lost under the first scenario compared to a loss of 41% of carbon stocks under the second scenario. Quantifying the impacts of differing future scenarios using the method we document here will be important if payments for ecosystem services are to be used to change policy in order to maintain critical ecosystem services.

KW - Ecosystem

KW - Geographic Information Systems

KW - Models, Theoretical

KW - Socioeconomic Factors

KW - Tanzania

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.007

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 20932636

VL - 92

SP - 563

EP - 574

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 40361329