Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearch

Standard

Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome. / Bustamente, Carlos D.; Fledel-Alon, Adi; Williamson, Scott; Nielsen, Rasmus; Hubisz, M.; Glanowski, Stephen; Tanenbaum, David M.; White, Thomas J.; Sninsky, John J.; Hernandez, Ryan D.; Civello, Daniel; Adams, Mark D.; Cargill, Michele; Clark, Andrew G.

In: Nature, Vol. 437, No. 7062, 2005, p. 1153-1157.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearch

Harvard

Bustamente, CD, Fledel-Alon, A, Williamson, S, Nielsen, R, Hubisz, M, Glanowski, S, Tanenbaum, DM, White, TJ, Sninsky, JJ, Hernandez, RD, Civello, D, Adams, MD, Cargill, M & Clark, AG 2005, 'Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome', Nature, vol. 437, no. 7062, pp. 1153-1157. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04240

APA

Bustamente, C. D., Fledel-Alon, A., Williamson, S., Nielsen, R., Hubisz, M., Glanowski, S., Tanenbaum, D. M., White, T. J., Sninsky, J. J., Hernandez, R. D., Civello, D., Adams, M. D., Cargill, M., & Clark, A. G. (2005). Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome. Nature, 437(7062), 1153-1157. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04240

Vancouver

Bustamente CD, Fledel-Alon A, Williamson S, Nielsen R, Hubisz M, Glanowski S et al. Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome. Nature. 2005;437(7062):1153-1157. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04240

Author

Bustamente, Carlos D. ; Fledel-Alon, Adi ; Williamson, Scott ; Nielsen, Rasmus ; Hubisz, M. ; Glanowski, Stephen ; Tanenbaum, David M. ; White, Thomas J. ; Sninsky, John J. ; Hernandez, Ryan D. ; Civello, Daniel ; Adams, Mark D. ; Cargill, Michele ; Clark, Andrew G. / Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome. In: Nature. 2005 ; Vol. 437, No. 7062. pp. 1153-1157.

Bibtex

@article{20e90b3074c311dbbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome",
abstract = "Comparisons of DNA polymorphism within species to divergence between species enables the discovery of molecular adaptation in evolutionarily constrained genes as well as the differentiation of weak from strong purifying selection1, 2, 3, 4. The extent to which weak negative and positive darwinian selection have driven the molecular evolution of different species varies greatly5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, with some species, such as Drosophila melanogaster, showing strong evidence of pervasive positive selection6, 7, 8, 9, and others, such as the selfing weed Arabidopsis thaliana, showing an excess of deleterious variation within local populations9, 10. Here we contrast patterns of coding sequence polymorphism identified by direct sequencing of 39 humans for over 11,000 genes to divergence between humans and chimpanzees, and find strong evidence that natural selection has shaped the recent molecular evolution of our species. Our analysis discovered 304 (9.0%) out of 3,377 potentially informative loci showing evidence of rapid amino acid evolution. Furthermore, 813 (13.5%) out of 6,033 potentially informative loci show a paucity of amino acid differences between humans and chimpanzees, indicating weak negative selection and/or balancing selection operating on mutations at these loci. We find that the distribution of negatively and positively selected genes varies greatly among biological processes and molecular functions, and that some classes, such as transcription factors, show an excess of rapidly evolving genes, whereas others, such as cytoskeletal proteins, show an excess of genes with extensive amino acid polymorphism within humans and yet little amino acid divergence between humans and chimpanzees.",
author = "Bustamente, {Carlos D.} and Adi Fledel-Alon and Scott Williamson and Rasmus Nielsen and M. Hubisz and Stephen Glanowski and Tanenbaum, {David M.} and White, {Thomas J.} and Sninsky, {John J.} and Hernandez, {Ryan D.} and Daniel Civello and Adams, {Mark D.} and Michele Cargill and Clark, {Andrew G.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1038/nature04240",
language = "English",
volume = "437",
pages = "1153--1157",
journal = "Nature",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "nature publishing group",
number = "7062",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome

AU - Bustamente, Carlos D.

AU - Fledel-Alon, Adi

AU - Williamson, Scott

AU - Nielsen, Rasmus

AU - Hubisz, M.

AU - Glanowski, Stephen

AU - Tanenbaum, David M.

AU - White, Thomas J.

AU - Sninsky, John J.

AU - Hernandez, Ryan D.

AU - Civello, Daniel

AU - Adams, Mark D.

AU - Cargill, Michele

AU - Clark, Andrew G.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Comparisons of DNA polymorphism within species to divergence between species enables the discovery of molecular adaptation in evolutionarily constrained genes as well as the differentiation of weak from strong purifying selection1, 2, 3, 4. The extent to which weak negative and positive darwinian selection have driven the molecular evolution of different species varies greatly5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, with some species, such as Drosophila melanogaster, showing strong evidence of pervasive positive selection6, 7, 8, 9, and others, such as the selfing weed Arabidopsis thaliana, showing an excess of deleterious variation within local populations9, 10. Here we contrast patterns of coding sequence polymorphism identified by direct sequencing of 39 humans for over 11,000 genes to divergence between humans and chimpanzees, and find strong evidence that natural selection has shaped the recent molecular evolution of our species. Our analysis discovered 304 (9.0%) out of 3,377 potentially informative loci showing evidence of rapid amino acid evolution. Furthermore, 813 (13.5%) out of 6,033 potentially informative loci show a paucity of amino acid differences between humans and chimpanzees, indicating weak negative selection and/or balancing selection operating on mutations at these loci. We find that the distribution of negatively and positively selected genes varies greatly among biological processes and molecular functions, and that some classes, such as transcription factors, show an excess of rapidly evolving genes, whereas others, such as cytoskeletal proteins, show an excess of genes with extensive amino acid polymorphism within humans and yet little amino acid divergence between humans and chimpanzees.

AB - Comparisons of DNA polymorphism within species to divergence between species enables the discovery of molecular adaptation in evolutionarily constrained genes as well as the differentiation of weak from strong purifying selection1, 2, 3, 4. The extent to which weak negative and positive darwinian selection have driven the molecular evolution of different species varies greatly5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, with some species, such as Drosophila melanogaster, showing strong evidence of pervasive positive selection6, 7, 8, 9, and others, such as the selfing weed Arabidopsis thaliana, showing an excess of deleterious variation within local populations9, 10. Here we contrast patterns of coding sequence polymorphism identified by direct sequencing of 39 humans for over 11,000 genes to divergence between humans and chimpanzees, and find strong evidence that natural selection has shaped the recent molecular evolution of our species. Our analysis discovered 304 (9.0%) out of 3,377 potentially informative loci showing evidence of rapid amino acid evolution. Furthermore, 813 (13.5%) out of 6,033 potentially informative loci show a paucity of amino acid differences between humans and chimpanzees, indicating weak negative selection and/or balancing selection operating on mutations at these loci. We find that the distribution of negatively and positively selected genes varies greatly among biological processes and molecular functions, and that some classes, such as transcription factors, show an excess of rapidly evolving genes, whereas others, such as cytoskeletal proteins, show an excess of genes with extensive amino acid polymorphism within humans and yet little amino acid divergence between humans and chimpanzees.

U2 - 10.1038/nature04240

DO - 10.1038/nature04240

M3 - Letter

C2 - 16237444

VL - 437

SP - 1153

EP - 1157

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

IS - 7062

ER -

ID: 87087