Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. / Marsh, Sophie M. E.; Hoffmann, Michael; Burgess, Neil D.; Brooks, Thomas M.; Challender, Daniel W. S.; Cremona, Patricia J.; Hilton-Taylor, Craig; de Micheaux, Flore Lafaye; Lichtenstein, Gabriela; Roe, Dilys; Böhm, Monika.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 36, No. 2, e13844, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Marsh, SME, Hoffmann, M, Burgess, ND, Brooks, TM, Challender, DWS, Cremona, PJ, Hilton-Taylor, C, de Micheaux, FL, Lichtenstein, G, Roe, D & Böhm, M 2022, 'Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species', Conservation Biology, vol. 36, no. 2, e13844. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13844

APA

Marsh, S. M. E., Hoffmann, M., Burgess, N. D., Brooks, T. M., Challender, D. W. S., Cremona, P. J., Hilton-Taylor, C., de Micheaux, F. L., Lichtenstein, G., Roe, D., & Böhm, M. (2022). Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Conservation Biology, 36(2), [e13844]. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13844

Vancouver

Marsh SME, Hoffmann M, Burgess ND, Brooks TM, Challender DWS, Cremona PJ et al. Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Conservation Biology. 2022;36(2). e13844. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13844

Author

Marsh, Sophie M. E. ; Hoffmann, Michael ; Burgess, Neil D. ; Brooks, Thomas M. ; Challender, Daniel W. S. ; Cremona, Patricia J. ; Hilton-Taylor, Craig ; de Micheaux, Flore Lafaye ; Lichtenstein, Gabriela ; Roe, Dilys ; Böhm, Monika. / Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. In: Conservation Biology. 2022 ; Vol. 36, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{28721ebedac843578b69d67dec43af17,
title = "Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species",
abstract = "Unsustainable exploitation of wild species represents a serious threat to biodiversity and to the livelihoods of local communities and Indigenous peoples. However, managed, sustainable use has the potential to forestall extinctions, aid recovery, and meet human needs. We analyzed species-level data for 30,923 species from 13 taxonomic groups on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species to investigate patterns of intentional biological resource use. Forty percent of species (10,098 of 25,009 species from 10 data-sufficient taxonomic groups) were used. The main purposes of use were pets, display animals, horticulture, and human consumption. Intentional use is currently contributing to elevated extinction risk for 28–29% of threatened or near threatened (NT) species (2752–2848 of 9753 species). Intentional use also affected 16% of all species used (1597–1631 of 10,098). However, 72% of used species (7291 of 10,098) were least concern, of which nearly half (3469) also had stable or improving population trends. The remainder were not documented as threatened by biological resource use, including at least 172 threatened or NT species with stable or improving populations. About one-third of species that had use documented as a threat had no targeted species management actions to directly address this threat. To improve use-related red-list data, we suggest small amendments to the relevant classification schemes and required supporting documentation. Our findings on the prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use, and variation across taxa, can inform international policy making, including the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.",
keywords = "acci{\'o}n de conservaci{\'o}n, CITES, conservation action, Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biol{\'o}gica, Convention on Biological Diversity, exploitation, explotaci{\'o}n, fauna silvestre, IPBES, sustainable use, unsustainable uses, uso sustentable, usos no sustentables, wildlife",
author = "Marsh, {Sophie M. E.} and Michael Hoffmann and Burgess, {Neil D.} and Brooks, {Thomas M.} and Challender, {Daniel W. S.} and Cremona, {Patricia J.} and Craig Hilton-Taylor and {de Micheaux}, {Flore Lafaye} and Gabriela Lichtenstein and Dilys Roe and Monika B{\"o}hm",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/cobi.13844",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

AU - Marsh, Sophie M. E.

AU - Hoffmann, Michael

AU - Burgess, Neil D.

AU - Brooks, Thomas M.

AU - Challender, Daniel W. S.

AU - Cremona, Patricia J.

AU - Hilton-Taylor, Craig

AU - de Micheaux, Flore Lafaye

AU - Lichtenstein, Gabriela

AU - Roe, Dilys

AU - Böhm, Monika

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Unsustainable exploitation of wild species represents a serious threat to biodiversity and to the livelihoods of local communities and Indigenous peoples. However, managed, sustainable use has the potential to forestall extinctions, aid recovery, and meet human needs. We analyzed species-level data for 30,923 species from 13 taxonomic groups on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species to investigate patterns of intentional biological resource use. Forty percent of species (10,098 of 25,009 species from 10 data-sufficient taxonomic groups) were used. The main purposes of use were pets, display animals, horticulture, and human consumption. Intentional use is currently contributing to elevated extinction risk for 28–29% of threatened or near threatened (NT) species (2752–2848 of 9753 species). Intentional use also affected 16% of all species used (1597–1631 of 10,098). However, 72% of used species (7291 of 10,098) were least concern, of which nearly half (3469) also had stable or improving population trends. The remainder were not documented as threatened by biological resource use, including at least 172 threatened or NT species with stable or improving populations. About one-third of species that had use documented as a threat had no targeted species management actions to directly address this threat. To improve use-related red-list data, we suggest small amendments to the relevant classification schemes and required supporting documentation. Our findings on the prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use, and variation across taxa, can inform international policy making, including the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.

AB - Unsustainable exploitation of wild species represents a serious threat to biodiversity and to the livelihoods of local communities and Indigenous peoples. However, managed, sustainable use has the potential to forestall extinctions, aid recovery, and meet human needs. We analyzed species-level data for 30,923 species from 13 taxonomic groups on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species to investigate patterns of intentional biological resource use. Forty percent of species (10,098 of 25,009 species from 10 data-sufficient taxonomic groups) were used. The main purposes of use were pets, display animals, horticulture, and human consumption. Intentional use is currently contributing to elevated extinction risk for 28–29% of threatened or near threatened (NT) species (2752–2848 of 9753 species). Intentional use also affected 16% of all species used (1597–1631 of 10,098). However, 72% of used species (7291 of 10,098) were least concern, of which nearly half (3469) also had stable or improving population trends. The remainder were not documented as threatened by biological resource use, including at least 172 threatened or NT species with stable or improving populations. About one-third of species that had use documented as a threat had no targeted species management actions to directly address this threat. To improve use-related red-list data, we suggest small amendments to the relevant classification schemes and required supporting documentation. Our findings on the prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use, and variation across taxa, can inform international policy making, including the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.

KW - acción de conservación

KW - CITES

KW - conservation action

KW - Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica

KW - Convention on Biological Diversity

KW - exploitation

KW - explotación

KW - fauna silvestre

KW - IPBES

KW - sustainable use

KW - unsustainable uses

KW - uso sustentable

KW - usos no sustentables

KW - wildlife

U2 - 10.1111/cobi.13844

DO - 10.1111/cobi.13844

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34605070

AN - SCOPUS:85119084911

VL - 36

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 2

M1 - e13844

ER -

ID: 286311575