Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat. / Lin, Jianqing; Duchêne, David; Carøe, Christian; Smith, Oliver; Ciucani, Marta Maria; Niemann, Jonas; Richmond, Douglas; Greenwood, Alex D.; MacPhee, Ross; Zhang, Guojie; Gopalakrishnan, Shyam; Gilbert, M. Thomas P.

In: Current Biology, Vol. 32, No. 7, 2022, p. 1650-1656.e3.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lin, J, Duchêne, D, Carøe, C, Smith, O, Ciucani, MM, Niemann, J, Richmond, D, Greenwood, AD, MacPhee, R, Zhang, G, Gopalakrishnan, S & Gilbert, MTP 2022, 'Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat', Current Biology, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1650-1656.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.027

APA

Lin, J., Duchêne, D., Carøe, C., Smith, O., Ciucani, M. M., Niemann, J., Richmond, D., Greenwood, A. D., MacPhee, R., Zhang, G., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Gilbert, M. T. P. (2022). Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat. Current Biology, 32(7), 1650-1656.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.027

Vancouver

Lin J, Duchêne D, Carøe C, Smith O, Ciucani MM, Niemann J et al. Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat. Current Biology. 2022;32(7):1650-1656.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.027

Author

Lin, Jianqing ; Duchêne, David ; Carøe, Christian ; Smith, Oliver ; Ciucani, Marta Maria ; Niemann, Jonas ; Richmond, Douglas ; Greenwood, Alex D. ; MacPhee, Ross ; Zhang, Guojie ; Gopalakrishnan, Shyam ; Gilbert, M. Thomas P. / Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat. In: Current Biology. 2022 ; Vol. 32, No. 7. pp. 1650-1656.e3.

Bibtex

@article{dcd4798b6fa04ba185ca28dbe05ae313,
title = "Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat",
abstract = "Three principal methods are under discussion as possible pathways to “true” de-extinction; i.e., back-breeding, cloning, and genetic engineering.1,2 Of these, while the latter approach is most likely to apply to the largest number of extinct species, its potential is constrained by the degree to which the extinct species genome can be reconstructed. We explore this question using the extinct Christmas Island rat (Rattus macleari) as a model, an endemic rat species that was driven extinct between 1898 and 1908.3–5 We first re-sequenced its genome to an average of >60× coverage, then mapped it to the reference genomes of different Rattus species. We then explored how evolutionary divergence from the extant reference genome affected the fraction of the Christmas Island rat genome that could be recovered. Our analyses show that even when the extremely high-quality Norway brown rat (R. norvegicus) is used as a reference, nearly 5% of the genome sequence is unrecoverable, with 1,661 genes recovered at lower than 90% completeness, and 26 completely absent. Furthermore, we find the distribution of regions affected is not random, but for example, if 90% completeness is used as the cutoff, genes related to immune response and olfaction are excessively affected. Ultimately, our approach demonstrates the importance of applying similar analyses to candidates for de-extinction through genome editing in order to provide critical baseline information about how representative the edited form would be of the extinct species.",
keywords = "ancient DNA, Christmas Island rat, de-extinction, evolutionary divergence, genomic sequencing, molecular dating, Rattus macleari",
author = "Jianqing Lin and David Duch{\^e}ne and Christian Car{\o}e and Oliver Smith and Ciucani, {Marta Maria} and Jonas Niemann and Douglas Richmond and Greenwood, {Alex D.} and Ross MacPhee and Guojie Zhang and Shyam Gopalakrishnan and Gilbert, {M. Thomas P.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.027",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1650--1656.e3",
journal = "Current Biology",
issn = "0960-9822",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat

AU - Lin, Jianqing

AU - Duchêne, David

AU - Carøe, Christian

AU - Smith, Oliver

AU - Ciucani, Marta Maria

AU - Niemann, Jonas

AU - Richmond, Douglas

AU - Greenwood, Alex D.

AU - MacPhee, Ross

AU - Zhang, Guojie

AU - Gopalakrishnan, Shyam

AU - Gilbert, M. Thomas P.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Three principal methods are under discussion as possible pathways to “true” de-extinction; i.e., back-breeding, cloning, and genetic engineering.1,2 Of these, while the latter approach is most likely to apply to the largest number of extinct species, its potential is constrained by the degree to which the extinct species genome can be reconstructed. We explore this question using the extinct Christmas Island rat (Rattus macleari) as a model, an endemic rat species that was driven extinct between 1898 and 1908.3–5 We first re-sequenced its genome to an average of >60× coverage, then mapped it to the reference genomes of different Rattus species. We then explored how evolutionary divergence from the extant reference genome affected the fraction of the Christmas Island rat genome that could be recovered. Our analyses show that even when the extremely high-quality Norway brown rat (R. norvegicus) is used as a reference, nearly 5% of the genome sequence is unrecoverable, with 1,661 genes recovered at lower than 90% completeness, and 26 completely absent. Furthermore, we find the distribution of regions affected is not random, but for example, if 90% completeness is used as the cutoff, genes related to immune response and olfaction are excessively affected. Ultimately, our approach demonstrates the importance of applying similar analyses to candidates for de-extinction through genome editing in order to provide critical baseline information about how representative the edited form would be of the extinct species.

AB - Three principal methods are under discussion as possible pathways to “true” de-extinction; i.e., back-breeding, cloning, and genetic engineering.1,2 Of these, while the latter approach is most likely to apply to the largest number of extinct species, its potential is constrained by the degree to which the extinct species genome can be reconstructed. We explore this question using the extinct Christmas Island rat (Rattus macleari) as a model, an endemic rat species that was driven extinct between 1898 and 1908.3–5 We first re-sequenced its genome to an average of >60× coverage, then mapped it to the reference genomes of different Rattus species. We then explored how evolutionary divergence from the extant reference genome affected the fraction of the Christmas Island rat genome that could be recovered. Our analyses show that even when the extremely high-quality Norway brown rat (R. norvegicus) is used as a reference, nearly 5% of the genome sequence is unrecoverable, with 1,661 genes recovered at lower than 90% completeness, and 26 completely absent. Furthermore, we find the distribution of regions affected is not random, but for example, if 90% completeness is used as the cutoff, genes related to immune response and olfaction are excessively affected. Ultimately, our approach demonstrates the importance of applying similar analyses to candidates for de-extinction through genome editing in order to provide critical baseline information about how representative the edited form would be of the extinct species.

KW - ancient DNA

KW - Christmas Island rat

KW - de-extinction

KW - evolutionary divergence

KW - genomic sequencing

KW - molecular dating

KW - Rattus macleari

U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.027

DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.027

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35271794

AN - SCOPUS:85126461226

VL - 32

SP - 1650-1656.e3

JO - Current Biology

JF - Current Biology

SN - 0960-9822

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 307312255