Quantifying uncertainty about how interventions are assigned would improve impact evaluation in conservation: reply to Rasolofoson 2022

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

Standard

Quantifying uncertainty about how interventions are assigned would improve impact evaluation in conservation : reply to Rasolofoson 2022. / Gordon Jones, Julia Patricia; Barnes, Megan; Eklund, Johanna; Ferraro, Paul J.; Geldmann, Jonas; Oldekop, Johan A.; Schleicher, Judith.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 36, No. 6, e14007, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Gordon Jones, JP, Barnes, M, Eklund, J, Ferraro, PJ, Geldmann, J, Oldekop, JA & Schleicher, J 2022, 'Quantifying uncertainty about how interventions are assigned would improve impact evaluation in conservation: reply to Rasolofoson 2022', Conservation Biology, vol. 36, no. 6, e14007. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14007

APA

Gordon Jones, J. P., Barnes, M., Eklund, J., Ferraro, P. J., Geldmann, J., Oldekop, J. A., & Schleicher, J. (2022). Quantifying uncertainty about how interventions are assigned would improve impact evaluation in conservation: reply to Rasolofoson 2022. Conservation Biology, 36(6), [e14007]. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14007

Vancouver

Gordon Jones JP, Barnes M, Eklund J, Ferraro PJ, Geldmann J, Oldekop JA et al. Quantifying uncertainty about how interventions are assigned would improve impact evaluation in conservation: reply to Rasolofoson 2022. Conservation Biology. 2022;36(6). e14007. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14007

Author

Gordon Jones, Julia Patricia ; Barnes, Megan ; Eklund, Johanna ; Ferraro, Paul J. ; Geldmann, Jonas ; Oldekop, Johan A. ; Schleicher, Judith. / Quantifying uncertainty about how interventions are assigned would improve impact evaluation in conservation : reply to Rasolofoson 2022. In: Conservation Biology. 2022 ; Vol. 36, No. 6.

Bibtex

@article{c3d0aa2eb4ad4f68b1dddfe92dd547c5,
title = "Quantifying uncertainty about how interventions are assigned would improve impact evaluation in conservation: reply to Rasolofoson 2022",
keywords = "causal inference, counterfactual, hidden bias, impact evaluation, statistical matching",
author = "{Gordon Jones}, {Julia Patricia} and Megan Barnes and Johanna Eklund and Ferraro, {Paul J.} and Jonas Geldmann and Oldekop, {Johan A.} and Judith Schleicher",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/cobi.14007",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying uncertainty about how interventions are assigned would improve impact evaluation in conservation

T2 - reply to Rasolofoson 2022

AU - Gordon Jones, Julia Patricia

AU - Barnes, Megan

AU - Eklund, Johanna

AU - Ferraro, Paul J.

AU - Geldmann, Jonas

AU - Oldekop, Johan A.

AU - Schleicher, Judith

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

KW - causal inference

KW - counterfactual

KW - hidden bias

KW - impact evaluation

KW - statistical matching

U2 - 10.1111/cobi.14007

DO - 10.1111/cobi.14007

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 36178010

AN - SCOPUS:85139066181

VL - 36

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 6

M1 - e14007

ER -

ID: 322557471