The Greenland ice sheet and the climate – a review

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference abstract for conferenceResearch

Standard

The Greenland ice sheet and the climate – a review. / Funder, Svend Visby; Kjeldsen, Kristian Kjellerup; Kjær, Kurt H.; O'Cofaigh, Colm.

2011. Abstract from XVIII INQUA-Congress, Bern, Switzerland.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference abstract for conferenceResearch

Harvard

Funder, SV, Kjeldsen, KK, Kjær, KH & O'Cofaigh, C 2011, 'The Greenland ice sheet and the climate – a review', XVIII INQUA-Congress, Bern, Switzerland, 21/07/2011 - 27/07/2011.

APA

Funder, S. V., Kjeldsen, K. K., Kjær, K. H., & O'Cofaigh, C. (2011). The Greenland ice sheet and the climate – a review. Abstract from XVIII INQUA-Congress, Bern, Switzerland.

Vancouver

Funder SV, Kjeldsen KK, Kjær KH, O'Cofaigh C. The Greenland ice sheet and the climate – a review. 2011. Abstract from XVIII INQUA-Congress, Bern, Switzerland.

Author

Funder, Svend Visby ; Kjeldsen, Kristian Kjellerup ; Kjær, Kurt H. ; O'Cofaigh, Colm. / The Greenland ice sheet and the climate – a review. Abstract from XVIII INQUA-Congress, Bern, Switzerland.1 p.

Bibtex

@conference{14ccd5d401f04619a88d0ad57399b848,
title = "The Greenland ice sheet and the climate – a review",
abstract = "During LGM the margins of the Greenland ice sheet around the whole perimeter stood on the shelf – but where? The first estimates had to be based on evidence from land such as weathering limits on coastal mountains, major moraine belts, and altitudes of marine limits. Still the estimates ranged from inner to outer shelf, often under the assumption that the ice margin could not stop mid-shelf, and if it reached the shelf edge in one area, this should apply to the whole perimeter. Modelling, mainly on the basis of palaeoclimatic data, have presented a similar disparity between maximum and minimum estimates, assessing the Greenland ice sheet{\textquoteright}s contribution to Holocene sea level rise - i.e. the difference in ice volume between LGM and now - to between 0.3 and 2.6 m. Recent years have given spectacular new insight into shelf-ice distribution and behaviour - especially by detailed seismic surveys on the shelf and cosmogenic isotope surface exposure dating on coastal mountains. Combining old and new evidence we present a new model on the ice distribution during LGM. The model is, as far as possible, based on tangible evidence and implies that different sectors of the ice sheet responded differently to climate change during and after LGM, and that coverage of the shelf may have been variable from one sector to another. Will the margin respond with similar complexity to global warming? ",
author = "Funder, {Svend Visby} and Kjeldsen, {Kristian Kjellerup} and Kj{\ae}r, {Kurt H.} and Colm O'Cofaigh",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 21-07-2011 Through 27-07-2011",

}

RIS

TY - ABST

T1 - The Greenland ice sheet and the climate – a review

AU - Funder, Svend Visby

AU - Kjeldsen, Kristian Kjellerup

AU - Kjær, Kurt H.

AU - O'Cofaigh, Colm

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - During LGM the margins of the Greenland ice sheet around the whole perimeter stood on the shelf – but where? The first estimates had to be based on evidence from land such as weathering limits on coastal mountains, major moraine belts, and altitudes of marine limits. Still the estimates ranged from inner to outer shelf, often under the assumption that the ice margin could not stop mid-shelf, and if it reached the shelf edge in one area, this should apply to the whole perimeter. Modelling, mainly on the basis of palaeoclimatic data, have presented a similar disparity between maximum and minimum estimates, assessing the Greenland ice sheet’s contribution to Holocene sea level rise - i.e. the difference in ice volume between LGM and now - to between 0.3 and 2.6 m. Recent years have given spectacular new insight into shelf-ice distribution and behaviour - especially by detailed seismic surveys on the shelf and cosmogenic isotope surface exposure dating on coastal mountains. Combining old and new evidence we present a new model on the ice distribution during LGM. The model is, as far as possible, based on tangible evidence and implies that different sectors of the ice sheet responded differently to climate change during and after LGM, and that coverage of the shelf may have been variable from one sector to another. Will the margin respond with similar complexity to global warming?

AB - During LGM the margins of the Greenland ice sheet around the whole perimeter stood on the shelf – but where? The first estimates had to be based on evidence from land such as weathering limits on coastal mountains, major moraine belts, and altitudes of marine limits. Still the estimates ranged from inner to outer shelf, often under the assumption that the ice margin could not stop mid-shelf, and if it reached the shelf edge in one area, this should apply to the whole perimeter. Modelling, mainly on the basis of palaeoclimatic data, have presented a similar disparity between maximum and minimum estimates, assessing the Greenland ice sheet’s contribution to Holocene sea level rise - i.e. the difference in ice volume between LGM and now - to between 0.3 and 2.6 m. Recent years have given spectacular new insight into shelf-ice distribution and behaviour - especially by detailed seismic surveys on the shelf and cosmogenic isotope surface exposure dating on coastal mountains. Combining old and new evidence we present a new model on the ice distribution during LGM. The model is, as far as possible, based on tangible evidence and implies that different sectors of the ice sheet responded differently to climate change during and after LGM, and that coverage of the shelf may have been variable from one sector to another. Will the margin respond with similar complexity to global warming?

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

Y2 - 21 July 2011 through 27 July 2011

ER -

ID: 34261304