Turbulent Mixing of Metal and Silicate during Planet Accretion – and interpretation of the Hf-W chronometer
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Turbulent Mixing of Metal and Silicate during Planet Accretion – and interpretation of the Hf-W chronometer. / Dahl, Tais Wittchen; Stevenson, David.
In: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 295, 2010, p. 177-186.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Turbulent Mixing of Metal and Silicate during Planet Accretion – and interpretation of the Hf-W chronometer
AU - Dahl, Tais Wittchen
AU - Stevenson, David
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - In the current view of planet formation, the final assembly of the Earth involved giant collisions between protoplanets(N1000 kmradius), with theMoon formed as a result of one such impact.At this stage the colliding bodieshad likely differentiated into a metallic core surrounded by a silicate mantle. During the Moon-forming impact,nearly all metal sank into the Earth's core. Weinvestigate towhat extent large self-gravitating iron cores can mixwith surrounding silicate and howthis influences the short-lived chronometer, Hf–W, used to infer the age of theMoon. We present fluid dynamical models of turbulent mixing in fully liquid systems, attempting to placeconstraints on the degree of mixing. Erosion of sinking cores driven by Rayleigh–Taylor instability does lead tointimate mixing and equilibration, but large blobs (N10 km diameter) do not emulsify entirely. Emulsification isenhanced if most of the accreting metal cores deform into thin structures during descent through the Earth'smantle. Yet, only 1–20% of Earth's corewould equilibrate with silicate during Earth's accretion. The initial speed ofthe impactor is of little importance. We proceed to evaluate the mixing potential for shear instabilities wheresilicate entrainment across vertical walls causes mixing. The turbulent structure indicates that vortices remain atthe largest scale and do not mix to centimeter length scale,where diffusion operates and isotopes can equilibrate.Thus, incomplete emulsification and equilibration of accreting iron cores is likely to occur.The extent of metal–silicate equilibration provides key information for interpretation of siderophile budgets andthe timing of core formation using the Hf–Wchronometer. The time scale of core formation derived fromthe Hf–Wchronometer is usually tied to the last major metal–silicate re-equilibration, believed to coincide with time ofthe Moon-forming impact. However, we show that large cores have limited ability to reset the Hf–W systeminthe silicate Earth. Excess 182W in bulk silicate Earth is more sensitive to early core formation processes than toradiogenic ingrowth after the last giant impact.
AB - In the current view of planet formation, the final assembly of the Earth involved giant collisions between protoplanets(N1000 kmradius), with theMoon formed as a result of one such impact.At this stage the colliding bodieshad likely differentiated into a metallic core surrounded by a silicate mantle. During the Moon-forming impact,nearly all metal sank into the Earth's core. Weinvestigate towhat extent large self-gravitating iron cores can mixwith surrounding silicate and howthis influences the short-lived chronometer, Hf–W, used to infer the age of theMoon. We present fluid dynamical models of turbulent mixing in fully liquid systems, attempting to placeconstraints on the degree of mixing. Erosion of sinking cores driven by Rayleigh–Taylor instability does lead tointimate mixing and equilibration, but large blobs (N10 km diameter) do not emulsify entirely. Emulsification isenhanced if most of the accreting metal cores deform into thin structures during descent through the Earth'smantle. Yet, only 1–20% of Earth's corewould equilibrate with silicate during Earth's accretion. The initial speed ofthe impactor is of little importance. We proceed to evaluate the mixing potential for shear instabilities wheresilicate entrainment across vertical walls causes mixing. The turbulent structure indicates that vortices remain atthe largest scale and do not mix to centimeter length scale,where diffusion operates and isotopes can equilibrate.Thus, incomplete emulsification and equilibration of accreting iron cores is likely to occur.The extent of metal–silicate equilibration provides key information for interpretation of siderophile budgets andthe timing of core formation using the Hf–Wchronometer. The time scale of core formation derived fromthe Hf–Wchronometer is usually tied to the last major metal–silicate re-equilibration, believed to coincide with time ofthe Moon-forming impact. However, we show that large cores have limited ability to reset the Hf–W systeminthe silicate Earth. Excess 182W in bulk silicate Earth is more sensitive to early core formation processes than toradiogenic ingrowth after the last giant impact.
M3 - Journal article
VL - 295
SP - 177
EP - 186
JO - Earth and Planetary Science Letters
JF - Earth and Planetary Science Letters
SN - 0012-821X
ER -
ID: 43717382